• About Moi?

blogsense-by-barb

~ at the Re-Birth of America!

blogsense-by-barb

Tag Archives: Born Alive Infant Protection Act

Obama and Infanticide

17 Friday Aug 2012

Posted by blogsense-by-barb in Articles, blogsense, Character, Community interest, Congress, conservative, Courage, Current Events, Election 2012, Family values, FREEDOM, government, history, Interests, life, Moral Character, Obama, Opinion, Passion, Republican, Seniors, tea party, US Constritution, WE THE PEOPLE, Women's Issues

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Born Alive Infant Protection Act, Pro-choice, Pro-Life

Obama and Infanticide

By Jeremy Pierce on February 22, 2008

Barack Obama’s opposition as an Illinois State Senator to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act has been making the rounds, with a lot of people overstating their case on both sides. Some conservatives are taking this as a sign that Obama thinks infanticide is morally ok, and some liberals are acting as if his approach is what any supporter of keeping abortion legal before viability should say. I’m not sure either is true, but I’m also not sure this reflects well on Obama.

Here is the law. It says that if a baby is born alive, whether by intended delivery or by failed abortion, it is legally a person, a human being, a child, and an individual. It counts as born alive only if it is completely removed from the mother (ignoring an umbilical cord connection, which does not count as a sufficient connection according to this law). Partial-birth abortion is thus not ruled out, because a partial birth is not a complete removal of the fetus. As long as the birth has not fully taken place, this law threatens no actual abortion rights.

Obama’s reason for not supporting this ban is not because he thinks it’s ok to kill a born fetus. As far as he’s said, he does not actually support infanticide (and he didn’t vote against the law; he just voted present, although that in itself was part of a strategy devised by Planned Parenthood of Illinois to protect pro-choice politicians from voters seeing how pro-choice they are). For his actual words, see comment 9 here. What he says is that he worries about the logic. Here is what seems to me to be his argument:

    1. The Supreme Court has declared laws banning abortion before viability to be unconstitutional.
    2. There is no difference between the moral status of a fetus inside its mother before viability and the moral status of a born baby at the same developmental stage.
    3. Therefore, banning the killing of a born baby at this stage is morally tantamount to banning abortion at a pre-viability stage. (from 2)
    4. Therefore, the law is unconstitutional. (from 1 and 3)

This argument does not amount to supporting infanticide morally. It is merely an argument based on the constitutional issue. According to Supreme Court precedent, this law is unconstitutional, and thus it’s pointless to pass it. He gives no moral argument against the ban, just a pragmatic one. So from this speech alone it’s impossible to get any clear support for infanticide.

Nevertheless, I think this is a terrible argument. The first premise is clearly true. I would argue that the second is also true. I see no difference in the intrinsic moral status of the fetus merely because it is contained within someone or is separate. However, I don’t think 1 and 3 guarantee 4. There’s no legal reason why morally inconsistent laws can’t occur. You can ban something that’s morally equivalent to something else that’s unconstitutional to ban, as long as the first thing isn’t unconstitutional to ban. But the real problem I have with the argument is his inference from 2 to 3.

The standard pro-choice argument is not that a mother has a right to kill a fetus growing within her. Only the most extreme abortion-choice proponents hold such a view. The standard view is that a woman’s right to control her body is morally more important than whatever rights a fetus might have. That argument allows for a fetus to have some sort of moral status such that killing it would be prima facie wrong, even if the bodily rights of the mother outweigh that. What this means is that the standard pro-choice argument does not accord a mother the right to the death of the fetus. If it survives removal, her rights have been satisfied. That means the moral status of the fetus is what kicks in to determine what you should do in such a case, and this law settles that question. It does not threaten the woman’s bodily rights, at least not according to the standard justification of abortion rights.

What this tells us about Obama is that he probably doesn’t hold to the standard justification for abortion rights. If he thinks 3 follows from 2, then he must think a mother actually has a right to the death of the fetus growing within her, even if it’s born. If he thinks the moral status of the fetus is what justifies keeping abortion legal, then he must think the pre-viable fetus has no moral status and thus a born pre-viable fetus has no moral status. So the right to expulsion isn’t what gives the right to abortion. What gives that right, on Obama’s view, is the utter lack of moral status of a human organism halfway through its uterine development.

Now this is a view that some people have. Mary Anne Warren has a paper defending the view that infants born at full term have no intrinsic moral status. She gives other reasons to oppose infanticide, but she doesn’t base those on moral status of the fetus. Peter Singer and Michael Tooley actually defend infanticide as morally permissible. But these views are extremely radical. Obama’s view (as far as we see here) may not be as radical as Warren’s, never mind Tooley and Singer’s, but I think it’s still far more radical than the view of the majority that supports pre-viability abortion rights.

The U.S. Senate voted 98-0 in favor of a law virtually identical to this one (with the only exception being a clause that makes it explicit that this law doesn’t change any legal status of pre-born fetuses). Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) gave a floor speech explaining why no pro-choice Democrat should worry about such a bill undermining or conflicting with the Supreme Court’s guarantee of abortion rights. Hillary Clinton was among the 98 Senators who voted yes. No senators voted no. Yet Barack Obama refused several times to sign on to what a unanimous U.S. Senate was willing to pass. So I think this is a very good example of how far to the left Obama really is despite the unfounded sense that so many people have of his being a moderate. > > > READ MORE

NOTE: If this were the ONLY issue, it’s still more than enough reason to vote Obama OUT November 6th, 2012! Don’t be late!

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Search BlogsensebyBarb

Honor our Fallen

Click EVERYDAY to Support our Vets!

Help Veterans! The Veterans Site

Top Posts & Pages

  • 30 Seconds of Wisdom From Coca Cola CEO
  • Freedom From Tyranny (via loopyloo)
  • Why Do We Observe Veterans Day?
  • That pesky ‘misunderstood’ Separation of Church & State wall thingy…
  • A Constitutional Battle: Shari'ah's Uphill Climb
  • Debt Ceiling vs Spending Cuts
  • Who are We Now? Who will We be in a Decade?
  • Could our public schools be better run by state and local citizens?

History of Posts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 963 other followers

ACT NOW! GET INVOLVED!


Visit Tea Party Command Center

Project 365 Vets

FACEBOOK CONNECTION

Barbara Brison

Create Your Badge

To Tweet or Not to Tweet!

  • The #1 reason I choose. AMAC is that it competes with AARP which was so much apart of Obamacare!blogsensebybarb 2 years ago
  • RT @newtgingrich: My typing is sometimes wrong but the principle is timeless in the American system. Mueller (note correct spelling) had a…blogsensebybarb 3 years ago
  • RT @tedcruz: As the son of a Cuban immigrant whose Dad came to get a math degree & become a computer programmer, I’m troubled that Dems see…blogsensebybarb 3 years ago
  • RT @newtgingrich: I want to reemphasize a key part of the American system. You are innocent until proven guilty. The left wants to reverse…blogsensebybarb 3 years ago
  • @StupidPlain @itsJeffTiedrich @realDonaldTrump When the truth is revealed, you will be disgraced, unless the media picks up the song.vblogsensebybarb 3 years ago
Follow @BrisonVoice

Americans Stand with Israel!

Flight 93 Memorial Design

Never Forget!!!!!!!

Photobucket Thanks, Cap'n Bob & the Damsel for helping us remember!

Blogroll

  • 2012 Patriot
  • America's Watchtower
  • American Thinker
  • American Veteran Magazine
  • Bare Naked Islam
  • Be Kind Rewrite
  • Be sure you are right, then go ahead
  • BLACKFIVE
  • Boudica BPI Weblog
  • Breitbart
  • Cassie's Perfect … Word
  • Citizen Tom
  • CITIZENS UNITED
  • Come in and Soak Awhile
  • Conservative News Central
  • Creeping Sharia
  • Dedicated To Heroes
  • Diary of a Mad Conservative
  • Doug Ross @ Journal
  • Fatherly Advice and RANTS
  • Fellowship of the Minds
  • Find an Outlet
  • Freedom, by the Way
  • Gds44's Blog
  • Green Mountain Scribes
  • Grumpy Opinions
  • I Hate the Media
  • Infidel Bloggers Alliance
  • It Makes Sense Blog
  • Jlthomson’s Blog
  • loopyloo305
  • LORINOV'S BLOG
  • Maggie’s Notebook
  • MICHELLE OBAMA'S MIRROR
  • My Facebook
  • Nice Deb
  • Now the End Begins
  • Oath Keepers
  • Proud Military Mom's Common Sense Blog
  • pumabydesign001's blog
  • Radio Patriot
  • Reclaim America Now!
  • Right Side News
  • Rogue Operator
  • Ron McGatlin
  • Samuel at Gilgal
  • SilenceDogood2010′s Blog
  • Socialism is Not the Answer
  • Sword At-The-Ready
  • The American Civil Rights Union
  • The American Conservative
  • The Conservatory
  • The Constitution Club
  • The Free Market Project
  • The Imaginative Conservative
  • The Last Refuge
  • The Liberty Tree
  • The Mad Jewess
  • The Patriot Factor
  • The Political War Zone
  • The Quest for Light
  • The Unknown Soldiers
  • The Western Experience
  • Tombo's World
  • USO
  • Velvetdreams Mindsay
  • VETERAN DEFENDERS OF AMERICA
  • Voting American
  • Wild Goose Festival
  • You Decide
  • ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+ ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)

PROUD of ALL Who SERVE!!!!

VETERANS Make the Connection

Our Star-Spangled Banner

Supporters of the US Constitution

TEA Party Member

Click for Bill of Rights

Please Pray for Our Troops

Versatile Blogger Award

August 2022
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Nov    

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Support Wounded Warriors

Let’s Fight FOCA Together!

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • blogsense-by-barb
    • Join 963 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • blogsense-by-barb
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: